4.5 Article

The transcriptional regulator PhoP mediates the tolC molecular mechanism on APEC biofilm formation and pathogenicity

期刊

AVIAN PATHOLOGY
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 211-220

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03079457.2019.1701182

关键词

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli; PhoP; tolC; biofilm; pathogenicity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772707]
  2. Anhui Agricultural University Graduate Innovation Fund [2019ysj-37]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a transcriptional regulator of the classical binary regulatory system, PhoP plays an important role in the life activities of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). In previous experiments, we found that the absence of phoP affects APEC biofilm formation and pathogenicity. To further explore the molecular mechanism of phoP regulation of these phenomena, the differentially expressed gene tolC was screened based on phoP-derived transcriptional data, and the specific sequence identity of the PhoP binding sequence was predicted by bioinformatics and verified by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA). The results showed that PhoP can directly bind to the tolC promoter. On this basis, tolC deletion and complementary strains were constructed. Biofilm formation was quantified by crystal violet staining and rdar morphology change was observed in these strains. Loss of tolC reduced biofilm formation. We also examined pathological changes in organ paraffin sections by challenging chicks with the strains. After loss of tolC, the clinical signs of pericarditis and liver and spleen enlargement in chicks were alleviated, and pathogenicity to the host cells was decreased. Additionally, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis revealed that tolC deletion downregulated secA/secB/secE/secY transcript levels, which are part of the type II secretion system secreting virulence effector element. These results indicate that tolC contributes to the phoP-mediated effect on APEC biofilm formation and pathogenicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据