4.4 Article

Binomial nomenclature for virus species: a consultation

期刊

ARCHIVES OF VIROLOGY
卷 165, 期 2, 页码 519-525

出版社

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00705-019-04477-6

关键词

Virus taxonomy; Species nomenclature; Nomenclature; Binomial species names; International committee on taxonomy of viruses (ICTV)

类别

资金

  1. Medical Research Council programme [MC_ UU_12014/3]
  2. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Vidi Grant [864.14.004]
  3. National Research, Development and Innovation Office NKFIH [NN128309]
  4. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), UK [SE2944]
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/E/I/00007035, BB/E/I/00007036, BBS/E/I/00007037]
  6. Battelle Memorial Institute
  7. US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [HHSN272200700016I]
  8. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station (MAFES), Mississippi State University
  9. BBSRC [BBS/E/I/00007037, BBS/E/I/00007036] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. MRC [MC_UU_12014/12, MC_UU_12014/3] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Executive Committee of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) recognizes the need for a standardized nomenclature for virus species. This article sets out the case for establishing a binomial nomenclature and presents the advantages and disadvantages of different naming formats. The Executive Committee understands that adopting a binomial system would have major practical consequences, and invites comments from the virology community before making any decisions to change the existing nomenclature. The Executive Committee will take account of these comments in deciding whether to approve a standardized binomial system at its next meeting in October 2020. Note that this system would relate only to the formal names of virus species and not to the names of viruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据