4.2 Article

Investigation of the dust reservoir effect of the Tarim Basin using WRF-GOCART model

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
卷 13, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-5154-x

关键词

Aerosol; Landform; Taklamakan; Gobi; China; East Asia

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91644226]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC0214002, 2016YFA0602004]
  3. Key Project of Science and Technology Plan of Sichuan Province [2018SZDZX0023]
  4. Basic Applied Research Project of Science and Technology Plan of Sichuan Province [2018JY0011]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Chengdu University of Information Technology [KYTZ201815]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Taklamakan and Gobi Deserts are two important dust source regions which are located in northwestern China where the topography is complicated. In this study, a historical severe dust episode was reconstructed and the subsequent dust behavior influenced by the topography was investigated by using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model coupled with the Goddard Chemistry Aerosol Radiation and Transport (GOCART) model. Based on the validated simulation results and model sensitivity trials, the study suggest that the topography of the Tarim Basin can function as a dust reservoir, which indicates that the basin can trap the ground-released dust at the beginning, and then re-release the trapped dust at a later time as a secondary source if the meteorological conditions permit. Moreover, to evaluate the dust reservoir effect of the Tarim Basin on the adjacent area, the mass concentration of PM10 was measured during the dust episode in a downwind city. Overall, given the dust modeling and PM10 sampling, the results indicate that the dust reservoir cannot only re-release dust aerosol as a secondary source, but also, the existence of a dust reservoir can prolong and exacerbate the impact on the air quality of the adjacent area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据