4.7 Article

Modeling and performance investigation on the counter-flow ultrasonic atomization liquid desiccant regenerator

期刊

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114573

关键词

Counter-flow; Ultrasonic atomization; Liquid desiccant; Regenerator; Modeling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876115]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As the key components in a liquid desiccant dehumidification system, liquid desiccant regenerator produces great effect on the whole system's performance. This paper studies the counter-flow ultrasonic atomization liquid desiccant regenerator. Firstly, a mathematical model for the regenerator has been established and experimentally validated with finite difference method. Two performance indicators, i.e., the moisture removal rate and the regeneration thermal efficiency, were suggested to evaluate the performance of the counter-flow regenerator, and the influences of inlet parameters on the regeneration performance of the counter-flow regenerator have been investigated by the established model in this study. Decreasing temperature difference and increasing humidity difference between air and solution can improve regeneration performance. With the temperature of air and solution increasing, the regeneration efficiency increases, but the energy loss also increases. The regeneration efficiency decreases with the increase of solution concentration. The regeneration efficiency increases nonlinearly with the increase of gas-liquid ratio. Finally, there exists an optimum droplet size for the best regeneration performance. Compared with the parallel-flow configuration, the counter-flow has better regeneration performance, which is attributed to the more uniform distribution of moisture transfer driving force and the longer residence time of droplets in the regenerator. The study contributes to the development and the better applications of the counter-flow ultrasonic atomization liquid desiccant regenerator.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据