4.7 Article

In situ TiC/Inconel 625 nanocomposites fabricated by selective laser melting: Densification behavior, microstructure evolution, and wear properties

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 518, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145981

关键词

Selective laser melting; Nanocomposites; TiC; Microstructure; Wear

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51975261]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20160014]
  3. Innovation Team of Six Talents Peaks in Jiangsu Province [2019TD-KTHY-005]
  4. Research Innovation Program for College Graduates of Jiangsu Province [SJKY19_2531]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An Inconel 625-based nanocomposite reinforced with TiC nanoparticles (TiC/IN625) was successfully prepared by selective laser melting. The effects of laser fluence on the densification, microstructure, crystal structure, microhardness, and wear performance of the prepared nanocomposites were systematically investigated. A low laser fluence induced many defects, such as pores, cavities, and unmelted particles, whereas a high laser fluence resulted in a significantly increased densification. The increase in the laser fluence resulted in the continuous development of the microstructure of TiC/IN625 nanocomposites. A laser fluence of 139 J/mm(3) led to insufficient growth, while a sufficient growth was achieved at the laser fluence of 167 J/mm(3); at 208 J/mm(3), refined columnar/cellular dendrites were formed. Compared to IN625, smaller grains (less than 5 mu m) and a larger proportion of sub-grain boundaries appeared in the TiC/IN625 nanocomposites due to grain refinement. The TiC phases precipitated in situ in the grain boundaries, and a high level of dislocation was introduced into the TiC/IN625 nanocomposites. The maximum microhardness of the TiC/IN625 nanocomposites was 440 HV at the laser fluence of 208 J/mm(3). The lowest coefficient of friction and wear rate were 0.33 and 3.5 x 10(-4) mm(3) N-1 m(-1), respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据