4.7 Article

Air quality prediction by neuro-fuzzy modeling approach

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105898

关键词

Air quality; Fuzzy rules; Fuzzy neural network; Time series; Clustering; Optimization algorithms

资金

  1. MOST, Taiwan [MOST-107-2221-E-110-065, MOST-107-2622-E-110-008-CC3]
  2. EPA, Taiwan [MOST-107-EPA-F-012-001]
  3. NSYSU-KMU Joint Research Project, Taiwan [NSYSUKMU 108P042]
  4. Intelligent Electronic Commerce Research Center, NSYSU, Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an air quality prediction system based on the neuro-fuzzy network approach. Historical time series data are employed to derive a set of fuzzy rules, or equivalently a neuro-fuzzy network, for forecasting air pollutant concentrations and environmental factors in the future. Due to the uncertainty of the involved impact factors, fuzzy elements are added to the forecasting system. First of all, training data are partitioned into fuzzy clusters whose membership functions are characterized by the estimated means and variances. From these fuzzy clusters, fuzzy rules are extracted and a four-layer fuzzy neural network is constructed. Then genetic, particle swarm optimization, and steepest descent backpropagation algorithms are applied to train the network. The network outputs, derived through the fuzzy inference process, produce the forecast air pollutant concentrations or air quality indices. Our proposed approach has the following advantages: (1) Adding fuzzy elements can more appropriately deal with the uncertainty of the impact factors involved; (2) The distribution of training data can be described properly by fuzzy clusters with statistical means and variances; (3) Fuzzy rules are extracted automatically from the training data, instead of being supplied manually by human experts; (4) The obtained fuzzy rules are of high quality, and their parameters can be optimized effectively. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据