4.7 Article

A new convolutional neural network model for peripapillary atrophy area segmentation from retinal fundus images

期刊

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105890

关键词

Deep learning; Medical image segmentation; Peripapillary atrophy segmentation; Convolutional neural networks; Fully convolutional network

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71771131, 71432004, 71490724, 81700882]
  2. priming scientific research foundation for the researcher in Beijing Tongren Hospital, China [2017-YJJ-GGL-009, 2018-YJJ-ZZL-052]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peripapillary atrophy (PPA) is a clinical finding, which reflects the atrophy of retina layer and retinal pigment epithelium. The size of PPA area is a useful medical indicator, as it is highly associated with many diseases such as glaucoma and myopia. Therefore, separating the PPA area from retinal images, which is called PPA area segmentation, is very important. It is a challenging task, because PPA areas are irregular and non-uniform, and their contours are blurry and change gradually. To solve these issues, we transform the PPA area segmentation task into a task of segmenting another two areas with relatively regular and uniform shapes, and then propose a novel multi-task fully convolutional network (MFCN) model to jointly extract them from retinal images. Meanwhile, we take edge continuity of the target area into consideration. To evaluate the performance of the proposed model, we conduct experiments on images with PPA areas labelled by experts and achieve an average precision of 0.8928, outperforming the state-of-the-art models. To demonstrate the application of PPA segmentation in medical research, we apply PPA related features based on the segmented PPA area on differentiating glaucomatous and physiologic large cup cases. Experiment conducted on real datasets confirms the effectiveness of using these features for glaucoma diagnosis. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据