4.5 Article

Arsenic(V) sorption kinetics in long-term arsenic pesticide contaminated soils

期刊

APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104444

关键词

Sorption rate; Pollution; Non-contaminated soil; Aged contaminated soil; Kinetic model

资金

  1. Southern Cross University (SCU), Australia
  2. School of Environment Science and Engineering, SCU
  3. APA (Australian Postgraduate Award) scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Historic As contamination of soils occurs throughout the world from mining, industrial and agricultural activities. Sorption processes and rate may strongly influence soil As mobility, which further influences As bioavailability and toxicity. We investigated the kinetics of As(V) sorption by adding the arsenic onto both pristine (non-contaminated) and historically contaminated soils from arsenicals in two contrasting soil types (ferralitic and sandy). Results suggest both pseudo-second order (PSO) and Elovich kinetic models produce robust correlations with good data fits to linearized plots (R-2 approximate to 0.900-0.999) that describe the arsenic sorption kinetics for both contaminated and pristine soils. The arsenic sorption data are generally best described by the Elovich model with smaller normalized standard deviations (Delta q <5%) than PSO model. In addition, the surface binding to exchangeable and specific sorption of fresh arsenic (63-96%) sites has an impact on the overall low rate of As(V) sorption in the aged contaminated soils. Pristine soils particularly ferralitic soils show intraparticle diffusion and/or surface precipitation, which can contribute to a greater irreversibility of As(V) binding in soil. In contrast, the As(V) sorption occurred in the pristine sandy soil in a similar fashion to that of the aged contaminated soil, most likely due to both soil groups having limited strong binding sites. The detailed knowledge from this study provides new insights into the reclamation and management of As contaminated sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据