4.8 Article

Improvement of zinc-cerium redox flow batteries using mixed methanesulfonate-chloride negative electrolyte

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113894

关键词

Cerium; Zinc; Deposition; Energy storage; Mixed electrolyte; Redox flow battery

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [170912-2013-RGPIN]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of a zinc-cerium redox flow battery (RFB) with mixed methanesulfonate (MSA) - chloride negative electrolyte is compared to that of a zinc-cerium RFB with pure MSA electrolyte. Half-cell studies on a polyvinyl-ester carbon electrode confirm that the addition of Cl- ions increases the amount of zinc deposited during cathodic polarization and the exchange current density of the zinc redox reaction. Hence, an electrolyte with a composition of 0.9 mol dm(-3) ZnMSA and 0.6 mol dm(-3) ZnCl2 in 1 mol dm(-3) MSA is chosen as the negative electrolyte for use in a bench-scale zinc-cerium RFB. Reference electrodes are also incorporated in the RFB set-up so that the potential of each electrode can be monitored during operation. The results of the full-cell experiments show that the battery voltage efficiency increases with mixed MSA-chloride electrolyte due to the lower overpotential of the zinc half-cell reaction. Moreover, under the conditions where the zinc redox reaction is the main limiting factor, the charge efficiency rises significantly when the mixed solution is employed. Additionally, a life-cycle analysis of the battery based on a 15-min charge period and current density of 25 mA cm(-2) shows that the total operating time and number of cycles increases from 42 h and 97 cycles, respectively, in the case where the conventional negative electrolyte is used to more than 75 h and 166 cycles when Cl- is added. Based on these results, a zinc-cerium RFB with mixed MSA-chloride negative electrolyte has a notably longer life and higher energy efficiency compared to conventional zinc-cerium RFBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据