4.8 Article

Defect-rich and electron-rich mesoporous Ti-MOFs based NH2-MIL-125(Ti)@ZnIn2S4/CdS hierarchical tandem heterojunctions with improved charge separation and enhanced solar-driven photocatalytic performance

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 262, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118202

关键词

Mesoporous material; Photocatalysis; Tandem heterojunctions; Hierarchical structure; Surface defect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21871078, 51672073]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [B2018010]
  3. Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Startup Fund [LBH-Q14135]
  4. Heilongjiang University Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [JCL201802]
  5. Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Heilongjiang Province [2018-KYYWF-1593]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defective-rich and electron-rich mesoporous NH2-MIL-125(Ti)@ZnIn2S4/CdS hierarchical tandem heterojunctions were fabricated through two-step solvothermal and one-step hydrothermal strategies. The interface with electron enrichment can cause active interface reaction, fast transfer and separation of charge carriers and restrain the photocorrosion of CdS. ZnIn2S4, as a bridge to connect Ti-MOFs and CdS, favors the separation of charge carriers and forms tandem heterojunctions. The as-prepared photocatalyst has a relative large surface area of similar to 877.0 m 2 g(-1) and a narrow band gap of similar to 1.84 eV, which could absorb visible light efficiently. Furthermore, it exhibits a high photocatalytic hydrogen generation rate which was increased to 2.367 mmol g(-1) h(-1) and the high photocatalytic degradation efficiency for 2,6-dichlorophen and 2,4,5-trichlorophenol which were 98.6% and 97.5%, respectively. Additionally, recycling text for several cycles indicates the high stability. This novel Ti-MOFs based core@shell hierarchical tandem heterojunctions may offer a new insight for fabricating high-performance heterojunctions for multi-channel charges transfer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据