4.8 Article

A new trick for an old support: Stabilizing gold single atoms on LaFeO3 perovskite

期刊

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
卷 261, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118178

关键词

Gold single atoms; Perovskite; Sintering-resistance; Self-activating; CO oxidation

资金

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, Catalysis Science program
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1465057]
  3. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-76SF00515]
  4. Office of Science of US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Fundamental Research Fundsfor the Central Universities [50621021901007]
  6. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering [SKL-ChE-19C02]
  7. Young Thousand Talents Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Single-atom catalysts (SACS) have shown great potential for achieving superior catalytic activity due to maximizing metal efficiency. The key obstacle in developing SACS lies in the availability of supports that can stabilize SACS. Here we report the first successful development of single gold (Au) atom catalysts supported on high-surface-area hierarchical perovskite oxides. The resulting Au single-atoms are extremely stable at calcination temperatures up to 700 degrees C in air and under reaction conditions. A high catalytic activity for CO oxidation and distinct self-activating property were also achieved. Furthermore, evidenced by theoretical calculations and experimental studies including X-ray absorption fine structures and in situ Fourier-transform infrared spectra, the surface Au active sites are confirmed to be predominately positively charged. This work provides a generalizable approach to fabricating highly stable Au single-atom catalysts with tunable catalytic performance, and we anticipate that this discovery will facilitate new possibilities for the development of single atom catalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据