4.5 Article Book Chapter

3D Printed Microfluidics

期刊

出版社

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-091619-102649

关键词

additive manufacturing; microdevice fabrication; stereolithography; fused deposition modeling; PolyJet; polydimethylsiloxane; PDMS

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 EB027096, R15 GM123405-01A1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional microfabrication techniques suffer from several disadvantages, including the inability to create truly three-dimensional (3D) architectures, expensive and time-consuming processes when changing device designs, and difficulty in transitioning from prototyping fabrication to bulk manufacturing. 3D printing is an emerging technique that could overcome these disadvantages. While most 3D printed fluidic devices and features to date have been on the millifluidic size scale, some truly microfluidic devices have been shown. Currently, stereolithography is the most promising approach for routine creation of microfluidic structures, but several approaches under development also have potential. Microfluidic 3D printing is still in an early stage, similar to where polydimethylsiloxane was two decades ago. With additional work to advance printer hardware and software control, expand and improve resin and printing material selections, and realize additional applications for 3D printed devices, we foresee 3D printing becoming the dominant microfluidic fabrication method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据