A Cross-sectional Analysis of Insurance Coverage of Extremity Contouring After Massive Weight Loss

Introduction After bariatric surgery, patients often experience redundant skin in the upper arms and medial thighs as sequelae of massive weight loss. Insurance companies have unpredictable criteria to determine the medical necessity of brachioplasty and thighplasty, which are often ascribed as cosmetic procedures. We evaluated current insurance coverage and characterized policy criteria for extremity contouring in the postbariatric population. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for coverage of brachioplasty and thighplasty in January 2019. Insurance companies were selected based on their state enrolment data and market share. A web-based search and direct calls were conducted to identify policies. A comprehensive list of standard criteria was compiled based on the policies that offered coverage. Results Of the 56 insurance companies assessed, half did not provide coverage for either procedure (n = 28). No single criterion featured universally across brachioplasty and thighplasty policies. Functional impairment was the most commonly cited condition for preapproval of brachioplasty and/or thighplasty (94%). Conversely, minimum weight loss was the least frequent criterion within the insurance policies (6%). Only 5% of the insurance companies (n = 3) would consider coverage of liposuction-assisted lipectomy as a modality for brachioplasty or thighplasty. Conclusions We propose a comprehensive list of reporting recommendations to help optimize authorization of extremity contouring in the postbariatric population. There is great intercompany variation in preapproval criteria for brachioplasty and thighplasty, illustrating an absence of established recommendations or guidelines. High-level evidence and investigations are needed to ascertain validity of the limited coverage criteria in current use.