4.6 Article

Genetic diversity of wild wintering red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis) by microsatellite markers and mitochondrial Cyt B gene sequence in the Yancheng reserve

期刊

ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 531-536

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10495398.2020.1725538

关键词

Red-crowned crane; Cyt b gene; microsatellite; genetic diversity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670432, 31800453]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20160927]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study on genetic variation of wild red-crowned cranes in East Asia revealed high polymorphism in the migratory population, providing valuable information for reintroduction efforts and understanding the genetic properties of the endangered crane population.
The red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis) is one of the most endangered cranes in the world, and its wild population is still declining. To characterize the genetic resources of East Asian migratory populations, we studied the genetic variation in wild red-crowned cranes at the Yancheng reserve. Based on a partial Cyt b gene sequence, 32 wild red-crowned crane samples were screened from 100 feathers with unknown sample information. Twelve haplotypes were detected using 32 wild red-crowned crane samples. Six pairs of published microsatellite primers were selected for genotyping. A total of 47 alleles were obtained, with an average of 7.8 alleles per locus. All microsatellite loci were highly polymorphic; the average polymorphic information content and expected heterozygosity were 0.721 +/- 0.080 and 0.768 +/- 0.071, respectively. These results show that the East Asian migratory population of wild red-crowned cranes exhibits high polymorphism. These data are useful for informing reintroduction efforts. The study results provide a basis for understanding the population genetic properties of an endangered crane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据