4.8 Article

Giant Emission Enhancement of Solid-State Gold Nanoclusters by Surface Engineering

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 59, 期 21, 页码 8270-8276

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202001034

关键词

atomic precision; emission enhancement; gold nanoclusters; surface engineering

资金

  1. MOE [MOE2016-T2-2-020, MOE2017-T2-1-056, R-143-000-A75-114]
  2. NUS flagship green energy program
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21590792, 91645203, 21521091, 21601193, 21703134]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [31020190QD013]
  5. Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China [2017M612713]
  6. Guangdong Special Support Program
  7. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQJSCX20170727100802505, KQTD2016053112042971]
  8. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) [1527000014]
  9. National Center for Theoretical Sciences
  10. Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST-107-2628-M-110-001MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ligand-induced surface restructuring with heteroatomic doping is used to precisely modify the surface of a prototypical [Au-25(SR1)(18)](-) cluster (1) while maintaining its icosahedral Au-13 core for the synthesis of a new bimetallic [Au19Cd3(SR2)(18)](-) cluster (2). Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies reveal that six bidentate Au-2(SR1)(3) motifs (L2) attached to the Au-13 core of 1 were replaced by three quadridentate Au2Cd(SR2)(6) motifs (L4) to create a bimetallic cluster 2. Experimental and theoretical results demonstrate a stronger electronic interaction between the surface motifs (Au2Cd(SR2)(6)) and the Au-13 core, attributed to a more compact cluster structure and a larger energy gap of 2 compared to that of 1. These factors dramatically enhance the photoluminescence quantum efficiency and lifetime of crystal of the cluster 2. This work provides a new route for the design of a wide range of bimetallic/alloy metal nanoclusters with superior optoelectronic properties and functionality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据