4.8 Article

Enhancing Multicomponent Metal-Organic Frameworks for Low Pressure Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier Separations

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 59, 期 15, 页码 6090-6098

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201916159

关键词

cubane; functional materials; hydrocarbon separation; liquid organic hydrogen carriers; multicomponent MOFs

资金

  1. MBIE Catalyst Fund [MAUX1609]
  2. Australian Research Council (DECRA) [DE160100987]
  3. MacDiarmid Institute
  4. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) [MAUX1609] Funding Source: New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The resurgence of interest in the hydrogen economy could hinge on the distribution of hydrogen in a safe and efficient manner. Whilst great progress has been made with cryogenic hydrogen storage or liquefied ammonia, liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs) remain attractive due to their lack of need for cryogenic temperatures or high pressures, most commonly a cycle between methylcyclohexane and toluene. Oxidation of methylcyclohexane to release hydrogen will be more efficient if the equilibrium limitations can be removed by separating the mixture. This report describes a family of six ternary and quaternary multicomponent metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) that contain the three-dimensional cubane-1,4-dicarboxylate (cdc) ligand. Of these MOFs, the most promising is a quaternary MOF (CUB-30), comprising cdc, 4,4 '-biphenyldicarboxylate (bpdc) and tritopic truxene linkers. Contrary to conventional wisdom that adsorptive interactions with larger, hydrocarbon guests are dominated by pi-pi interactions, here we report that contoured aliphatic pore environments can exhibit high selectivity and capacity for LOHC separations at low pressures. This is the first time, to the best of our knowledge, where selective adsorption for cyclohexane over benzene is witnessed, underlining the unique adsorptive behavior afforded by the unconventional cubane moiety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据