4.8 Article

A Direct Fluorescent Activity Assay for Glycosyltransferases Enables Convenient High-Throughput Screening: Application to O-GlcNAc Transferase

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 59, 期 24, 页码 9601-9609

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202000621

关键词

enzymes; fluorescent probes; glycosylation; high-throughput screening; inhibitors

资金

  1. Tier I Canada Research Chair in Chemical Glycobiology
  2. E.W.R. Steacie Memorial Fellowship
  3. Canadian Glycomics Network [CD-1]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council [RGPIN-2015-05426]
  5. Canadian Foundation for Innovation [33097, 36766, 37241]
  6. British Columbia Knowledge Development Foundation [662-805223, 862-805636]
  7. Y.P. Heung Foundation
  8. PDRA [RP\EA\180016]
  9. National Health & Medical Research Council Australia [GNT1162515, GNT1137064]
  10. Australian Research Council [DP180101781]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycosyltransferases carry out important cellular functions in species ranging from bacteria to humans. Despite their essential roles in biology, simple and robust activity assays that can be easily applied to high-throughput screening for inhibitors of these enzymes have been challenging to develop. Herein, we report a bead-based strategy to measure the group-transfer activity of glycosyltransferases sensitively using simple fluorescence measurements, without the need for coupled enzymes or secondary reactions. We validate the performance and accuracy of the assay using O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) as a model system through detailed Michaelis-Menten kinetic analysis of various substrates and inhibitors. Optimization of this assay and application to high-throughput screening enabled screening for inhibitors of OGT, leading to a novel inhibitory scaffold. We believe this assay will prove valuable not only for the study of OGT, but also more widely as a general approach for the screening of glycosyltransferases and other group-transfer enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据