4.2 Article

Percutaneous intrarenal transplantation of differentiated induced pluripotent stem cells into newborn mice

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ar.24371

关键词

pluripotent stem cells; podocytes; newborn mouse; transplantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The in vivo engraftment of induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived podocytes following allogeneic transplantation into host kidneys remains a challenge. Here we investigate the survival and engraftment of human dermal fibroblasts-derived differentiated iPSCs using a newborn mouse model, which represents a receptive immunoprivileged host environment. iPSCs were generated from skin biopsies of patients using Sendai virus reprogramming. Differentiation of nephrin (NPHS1)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) iPSCs into kidney podocytes (iPSC-PODs) was performed by the addition of Activin A, bone morphogenetic protein 7 (BMP7), and retinoic acid over 10 days of culture. To assess the in vivo incorporation of cells, undifferentiated iPSCs or day 10 iPSC-PODs, were labeled with either carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) or Qdot nanocrystals (Q705). Thereafter, 1 x 10(5) differentiated iPSC-PODs were injected directly into the kidneys of mouse pups at postnatal day one (P1). Using co-expression analysis of glomerular and podocyte-specific markers, Day 10 differentiated iPSC-PODs that were positive for podocin, were detected following direct kidney injection into newborn mice up to 1 week after transplantation. Undifferentiated iPSC-PODs were not detected at the same timepoint. The transplanted cells were viable and located in the outer nephrogenic zone where they were found to colocalize with, or sit adjacent to, cells positive for glomerular-specific markers including podocin, synaptopodin, and Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1). This study provides proof-of-principle that transplanted iPSC-POD can survive in recipient newborn mouse kidneys due to the immature and immunoprivileged nature of the developing postnatal kidneys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据