4.8 Article

Immobilization and Function of nIR-Fluorescent Carbon Nanotube Sensors on Paper Substrates for Fluidic Manipulation

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 1, 页码 916-923

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03756

关键词

-

资金

  1. Walmart Foundation
  2. Walmart Food Safety Collaboration Center in Beijing
  3. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [2388357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoparticle-based optical sensors are capable of highly sensitive and selective chemical interactions and can form the basis of molecular recognition for various classes of analytes. However, their incorporation into standardized in vitro assays has been limited by their incompatibility with packaging or form factors necessary for specific applications. Here, we have developed a technique for immobilizing nIR-fluorescent single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) sensors on seven different types of paper substrates including nitrocellulose, nylon, poly(vinylidene fluoride), and cellulose. Sensors remain functional upon immobilization and exhibit nIR fluorescence in nonaqueous solvent systems. We then extend this system to the Corona Phase Molecular Recognition (CoPhIVIoRe) approach of synthetic molecular recognition by screening ssDNA-wrapped SWCNTs with different sequences against a panel of fat-soluble vitamins in canola oil, identifying a sensor which responds to beta-carotene with a dissociation constant of 2.2 mu M. Moreover, we pattern hydrophobic regions onto nitrocellulose using the wax printing method and form one-dimensional sensor barcodes for rapid multiplexing. Using a sensor array of select ssDNA wrappings, we are able to distinguish between Cu(II), Cd(II), Hg(II), and Pb(II) at a concentration of 100 mu M. Finally, we demonstrate that immobilized sensors remain fluorescent and responsive for nearly 60 days when stability is addressed. This work represents a significant step toward the deployment of fluorescent nanoparticle sensors for point-of-use applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据