4.8 Article

A General Mass Spectrometry-Based Method of Quantitating Prion Polymorphisms from Heterozygous Chronic Wasting Disease-Infected Cervids

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 92, 期 1, 页码 1276-1284

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04449

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, CRIS Project [CRIS 2030-32000-009-00]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic wasting disease (CWD) is the only prion disease naturally transmitted among farmed and free-ranging cervids (deer, elk, moose, etc.). These diseases are always fatal and have long asymptomatic incubation periods. By 2019, CWD-infected cervids had been detected in 26 states, three Canadian provinces, South Korea, Norway, Finland, and Sweden. Prions (PrPSc) replicate by inducing a normal cellular prion protein (PrPC) to adopt the prion conformation. This prion templated conformational conversion is influenced by PrPC polymorphisms. Cervid PrPC contains at least 20 different polymorphic sites. By using chymotrypsin, trypsin, or trypsin followed by chymotrypsin to digest denatured cervid PrP, 19 peptides suitable for multiple reaction monitoring (MRM)-based analysis and spanning positions 30-51, 61-112, and 114-231 of cervid PrP were identified. Ten of these peptides span polymorphism-containing regions of cervid PrP. The other nine contain no polymorphisms, so they can be used as internal standards. Calibration curves relating the area ratios of MRM signals from polymorphism-containing peptides to appropriate internal standard peptides were linear and had excellent correlation coefficients. Samples from heterozygous (G(96)/S-96) white-tailed deer orally dosed with CWD from homozygous (G(96)/G(96)) deer were analyzed. The G(96) polymorphism comprised 75 +/- 5% of the total PrP from the G(96)/S-96 heterozygotes. Heterozygous animals facilitate conversion of different PrPC polymorphisms into PrPSc. This approach can be used to quantitate the relative amounts of the polymorphisms present in other animal species and even humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据