4.7 Article

Micelle-dominated distribution strategy for non-matrix matched calibration without an internal standard: Extract-and-shoot approach for analyzing hydrophilic targets in blood and cell samples

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1102, 期 -, 页码 24-35

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2019.12.041

关键词

Micelle-dominated distribution; Non-matrix matched calibration; Extract and shoot; Biosamples

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21505068]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515011677]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [2016A030310391]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The analysis of trace hydrophilic targets in complex aqueous-rich matrices is considerably challenging, generally requiring matrix-matched calibration, internal standard, or time-and-labor-intensive sample preparation. To address this analytical bottleneck, a non-matrix-matched calibration strategy without using internal standard was reported for the first time to analyze complicated biosamples such as whole blood, plasma, serum, and cell samples. This strategy, termed micelle-dominated distribution, also aimed at realizing the simple extract-and-shoot analytical process for such complex matrices. The micelle-matrix interaction was found to efficiently eliminate the matrix effect by dominating phase separation and analyte distribution between the extraction and matrix phases. Thus, calibration linear curves prepared in water were applicable to the analysis of all the above-mentioned sample types. Rapid distribution equilibrium within 4 min was achieved. This strategy could tolerate direct large volume injection, thereby providing two-order-of-magnitude enhancement in the sensitivity of ion-pair chromatography. The analytical method integrated cell rupture, matrix cleanup, analyte extraction, and on-column preconcentration into a fast and high-throughput operation. The successful application to the determination of exogenous pesticides and endogenous glutathione exhibited low limits of detection (0.0085-0.015 mu g mL(-1) for pesticides; 0.52 mu g mL(-1) for glutathione), wide linear ranges (0.028-50 mu g mL(-)(1) and 0.049-50 mu g mL(-1) for pesticides; 1.7-1000 mu g mL(-1) for glutathione), good linearies (R-2 = 0.9994-0.9999), excellent accuracy (recoveries of 91.3-105.2%), and good precision (0.7-6.2% at the levels of 0.028 (or 0.049), 0.1, 0.5, and 50 mu g mL(-1) for pesticides; 0.5-8.7% at 1.7, 500, and 1000 mu g mL(-1) for glutathione). (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据