4.5 Article

Artificial neural network associated to UV/Vis spectroscopy for monitoring bioreactions in biopharmaceutical processes

期刊

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 1045-1054

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-014-1346-7

关键词

Artificial neural network; Biopharmaceutical process; UV-Vis spectroscopy; Bioreactor monitoring

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2010/52521-6]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [483009/2010-5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, mammalian cells are the most utilized hosts for biopharmaceutical production. The culture media for these cell lines include commonly in their composition a pH indicator. Spectroscopic techniques are used for biopharmaceutical process monitoring, among them, UV-Vis spectroscopy has found scarce applications. This work aimed to define artificial neural networks architecture and fit its parameters to predict some nutrients and metabolites, as well as viable cell concentration based on UV-Vis spectral data of mammalian cell bioprocess using phenol red in culture medium. The BHK-21 cell line was used as a mammalian cell model. Off-line spectra of supernatant samples taken from batches performed at different dissolved oxygen concentrations in two bioreactor configurations and with two pH control strategies were used to define two artificial neural networks. According to absolute errors, glutamine (0.13 +/- A 0.14 mM), glutamate (0.02 +/- A 0.02 mM), glucose (1.11 +/- A 1.70 mM), lactate (0.84 +/- A 0.68 mM) and viable cell concentrations (1.89 10(5) +/- A 1.90 10(5) cell/mL) were suitably predicted. The prediction error averages for monitored variables were lower than those previously reported using different spectroscopic techniques in combination with partial least squares or artificial neural network. The present work allows for UV-VIS sensor development, and decreases cost related to nutrients and metabolite quantifications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据