4.6 Review

Disentangling the Gordian knot of local metabolic control of coronary blood flow

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00325.2019

关键词

coronary circulation; coronary venous P-O2; local metabolic control; myocardial; oxygen consumption

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL-136386]
  2. Dutch Heart Foundation [CVON2014-11, 2000D038, 2000D042]
  3. Netherlands CardioVascular Research Initiative
  4. Indiana University School Medicine (Indianapolis, IN)
  5. Harry S. Truman Memorial Veteran's Hospital (Columbia, MO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recognition that coronary blood flow is tightly coupled with myocardial metabolism has been appreciated for well over half a century. However, exactly how coronary microvascular resistance is tightly coupled with myocardial oxygen consumption (M<(V)over dot>(O2)) remains one of the most highly contested mysteries of the coronary circulation to this day. Understanding the mechanisms responsible for local metabolic control of coronary blood flow has been confounded by continued debate regarding both anticipated experimental outcomes and data interpretation. For a number of years, coronary venous P-O2 has been generally accepted as a measure of myocardial tissue oxygenation and thus the classically proposed error signal for the generation of vasodilator metabolites in the heart. However, interpretation of changes in coronary venous P-O2 relative to M<(V)over dot>O-2 are quite nuanced, inherently circular in nature, and subject to confounding influences that remain largely unaccounted for. The purpose of this review is to highlight difficulties in interpreting the complex interrelationship between key coronary outcome variables and the arguments that emerge from prior studies performed during exercise, hemodilution, hypoxemia, and alterations in perfusion pressure. Furthermore, potential paths forward are proposed to help to facilitate further dialogue and study to ultimately unravel what has become the Gordian knot of the coronary circulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据