4.7 Article

Quality filtering of Illumina index reads mitigates sample cross-talk

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3217-x

关键词

Illumina; Sequencing; Multiplexing; Sequencing errors

资金

  1. Simons Foundation
  2. Targeted Grant in the Mathematical Modeling of Living Systems Award [342039]
  3. National Science Foundation [DEB 1457518]
  4. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, Hatch project [1006261]
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1457518] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Multiplexing multiple samples during Illumina sequencing is a common practice and is rapidly growing in importance as the throughput of the platform increases. Misassignments during de-multiplexing, where sequences are associated with the wrong sample, are an overlooked error mode on the Illumina sequencing platform. This results in a low rate of cross-talk among multiplexed samples and can cause detrimental effects in studies requiring the detection of rare variants or when multiplexing a large number of samples. Results: We observed rates of cross-talk averaging 0.24 % when multiplexing 14 different samples with unique i5 and i7 index sequences. This cross-talk rate corresponded to 254,632 misassigned reads on a single lane of the Illumina HiSeq 2500. Notably, all types of misassignment occur at similar rates: incorrect i5, incorrect i7, and incorrect sequence reads. We demonstrate that misassignments can be nearly eliminated by quality filtering of index reads while preserving about 90 % of the original sequences. Conclusions: Cross-talk among multiplexed samples is a significant error mode on the Illumina platform, especially if samples are only separated by a single unique index. Quality filtering of index sequences offers an effective solution to minimizing cross-talk among samples. Furthermore, we propose a straightforward method for verifying the extent of cross-talk between samples and optimizing quality score thresholds that does not require additional control samples and can even be performed post hoc on previous runs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据