4.6 Article

Establishing a Core Outcome Set for Peritoneal Dialysis: Report of the SONG-PD (Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis) Consensus Workshop

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 404-412

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Postgraduate Scholarship [APP1151343]
  2. NHMRC Fellowship [APP1106716]
  3. NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship [APP1117534]
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH)National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIIDDK) [K23DK103972]
  5. NHMRC Early Career Fellowship [APP1126256]
  6. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD)
  7. MRC [MC_PC_16100] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials in peritoneal dialysis (PD) are diverse, are measured inconsistently, and may not be important to patients, families, and clinicians. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis (SONG-PD) initiative aims to establish a core outcome set for trials in PD based on the shared priorities of all stakeholders. We convened an international SONG-PD stakeholder consensus workshop in May 2018 in Vancouver, Canada. Nineteen patients/caregivers and 51 health professionals attended. Participants discussed core outcome domains and implementation in trials in PD. Four themes relating to the formation of core outcome domains were identified: life participation as a main goal of PD, impact of fatigue, empowerment for preparation and planning, and separation of contributing factors from core factors. Considerations for implementation were identified: standardizing patient-reported outcomes, requiring a validated and feasible measure, simplicity of binary outcomes, responsiveness to interventions, and using positive terminology. All stakeholders supported inclusion of PD-related infection, cardiovascular disease, mortality, technique survival, and life participation as the core outcome domains for PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据