4.5 Article

Variation in morphological traits affects dispersal and seedling emergence in dispersive diaspores of Geropogon hybridus

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 107, 期 3, 页码 436-444

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1430

关键词

Asteraceae; functional trait; germination; population; seed; seed dispersal; seed mass; terminal velocity

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation [834/15]
  2. Jacob Blaustein Center for Scientific Cooperation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Premise Intraspecific variation in diaspore characteristics could affect various aspects of plant performance at the population, individual plant, and seed levels. We quantified variation in dispersal traits in a wind-dispersed annual, Geropogon hybridus (Asteraceae), focusing on continuous morphological traits of dispersive diaspores and their relationships to dispersal ability and seedling emergence. Methods We measured the morphological traits, terminal velocity, and seedling emergence of 1140 seeds from 10 populations in two successive years. We assessed the variation in traits among three hierarchical levels of organization and between years, and quantified their effects on diaspore terminal velocity and seedling emergence. Results Diaspore morphological traits varied substantially at the population, plant, and diaspore levels. Variables of pappus geometry, especially pappus width and pappus opening angle, were consistent between years and were found to be the best predictors of diaspore terminal velocity and seedling emergence. There was a significant negative relationship between diaspore terminal velocity and seedling emergence. Conclusions The intraspecific variation in diaspore traits is sufficiently large to substantially allow a dispersal-dormancy trade-off of individual diaspores. Our results support the hypothesis that traits of dispersive diaspores evolve in concert to select for increased dispersal potential, and provide an avenue to predict plant offspring performance through simply measured traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据