4.8 Article

Intrinsic Lithiophilicity of Li-Garnet Electrolytes Enabling High-Rate Lithium Cycling

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201906189

关键词

critical current density; interface; lithium-garnet; solid electrolyte; solid-state lithium batteries

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [11304198, 51972211]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0701900]
  3. SJTU Materials Genome Initiative Center [15X190030002]
  4. SMC-Chen Xing Young Scholar Award of SJTU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid-state lithium batteries are widely considered as next-generation lithium-ion battery technology due to the potential advantages in safety and performance. Among the various solid electrolyte materials, Li-garnet electrolytes are promising due to their high ionic conductivity and good chemical and electrochemical stabilities. However, the high electrode/electrolyte interfacial impedance is one of the major challenges. Moreover, short circuiting caused by lithium dendrite formation is reported when using Li-garnet electrolytes. Here, it is demonstrated that Li-garnet electrolytes wet well with lithium metal by removing the intrinsic impurity layer on the surface of the lithium metal. The Li/garnet interfacial impedance is determined to be 6.95 omega cm(2) at room temperature. Lithium symmetric cells based on the Li-garnet electrolytes are cycled at room temperature for 950 h and current density as high as 13.3 mA cm(-2) without showing signs of short circuiting. Experimental and computational results reveal that it is the surface oxide layer on the lithium metal together with the garnet surface that majorly determines the Li/garnet interfacial property. These findings suggest that removing the superficial impurity layer on the lithium metal can enhance the wettability, which may impact the manufacturing process of future high energy density garnet-based solid-state lithium batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据