4.5 Article

The Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) predicts substance abuse treatment completion

期刊

ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106189

关键词

Recovery capital; Substance abuse treatment completion; Personal and environmental contextual factors; Marijuana; Alcohol; Heroin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recovery from addiction requires various personal and environmental resources. The purposes of this study were to determine if the Assessment of Recovery Capital (ARC) scores measured at admission could predict substance abuse treatment (SAT) completion and to identify personal and environmental factors associated with ARC scores. Participants (N = 2265) comprised clients entering a Midwestern SAT facility (August 2015 - June 2017). Logistic regression was used to predict SAT completion using ARC scores. Nonparametric group comparisons were used for personal and environmental covariates. ARC scores significantly predicted successful SAT completion (OR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.04, 1.05, Wald z = 12.9, p < 0.001). Employment had a positive relationship with ARC scores (Kruskal-Wallis chi(2) = 215.96, df = 8, p < 0.001). ARC scores varied according to primary substance (Kruskal-Wallis chi(2) = 101.10, df = 6, p < 0.001); alcohol and marijuana showed the highest scores and heroin the lowest. ARC scores decreased as number of problem substances increased (Kruskal-Wallis chi(2) = 70.57, df = 2, p < 0.001, r(s) = -0.163, p < 0.001). Living arrangement was also significant (Kruskal-Wallis chi(2) = 146.36, df = 8, p < 0.001); clients who were homeless had the lowest ARC scores. A number of personal and environmental covariates were associated with the ARC scores and potentially with the outcome. After adjustment, the ARC remained a strong predictor of SAT completion. The ARC should be used in SAT facilities to guide treatment decisions and to create individualized treatment plans for clients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据