4.5 Review

The role of levonorgestrel intra-uterine system in the management of adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13798

关键词

adenomyosis; hormonal intrauterine device; levonorgestrel intrauterine system; pain relief

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction The levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) is a long-acting hormone-releasing uterine device that has many non-contraceptive benefits. The study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of LNG-IUS in the management of adenomyosis. Material and methods We searched the following bibliographic databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE and Google Scholar for the relevant studies which used LNG-IUS in management of patients with clinically or ultrasonographic diagnosed adenomyosis.The main outcome measures are pain score at the end of follow up, bleeding, symptomatic relief, uterine volume (mL), endometrial thickness (mm) and/or hemoglobin level. Results Ten prospective studies (patients n = 551) were included. The overall effect estimates showed that the LNG-IUS led to significant reductions in pain score after 12 months (standardized mean difference [SMD[ -3.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] -5.51 to -2.23, P < .001), 24 months (SMD -5.56, 95% CI -9.80 to -1.32, P = .01) and 36 months of insertion (SMD -3.81, 95% CI -4.27 to -3.36, P < .001). Similarly, the Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart (PBAC) showed significant reduction up to 36 months after LNG-IUS insertion (SMD -2.32, 95% CI -2.91 to -1.73, P < .001). The LNG-IUS led to significant reductions in the uterine volume 12 months (SMD -.60, 95% CI -.88 to -.31, P < .001) and 36 months after insertion (SMD -.42, 95% CI -.69 to -.14, P = .003). Conclusions LNG-IUS is a promising and effective option for the management of adenomyosis. Its use effectively reduced the severity of symptoms, uterine volume and endometrial thickness, and improved laboratory outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据