4.8 Article

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/Cas9-Mediated Lateral Flow Nucleic Acid Assay

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 2497-2508

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c00022

关键词

lateral flow assay; CRISPR/Cas9; Listeria monocytogenes detection; GMOs detection; ASFV detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21475048, 21874049, 91959128, 21904042, 31941004]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangdong Province [2014A030306008]
  3. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2019B020211004]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0501300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lateral flow assay is one of the most convenient analytical techniques for analyzing the immune response, but its applicability to precise genetic analyses is limited by the false-positive signal and tedious and inefficient hybridization steps. Here, we introduce the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) /Cas system into the lateral flow assay, termed CRISPR/Cas9-mediated lateral flow nucleic acid assay (CASLFA), to address such issues. In this study, CASLFA is utilized to identify Listeria monocytogenes, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and African swine fever virus (ASFV) at a detection limit of hundreds of copies of genome samples with high specificity within 1 h. We further evaluated the performance of CASLFA in a nonlaboratory environment and successfully confirmed 27 ASFV-infected samples from 110 suspected swine serum samples, with an accuracy of 100% when compared to real-time PCR (RT-PCR) assay. CASLFA satisfies some of the characteristics of a next-generation molecular diagnostics tool due to its rapidity and accuracy, allowing for point-of-care use without the need for technical expertise and complex ancillary equipment. This method has great potential for gene analysis in resource-poor or nonlaboratory environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据