4.8 Article

Folin-Ciocalteu Assay Inspired Polyoxometalate Nanoclusters as a Renal Clearable Agent for Non-Inflammatory Photothermal Cancer Therapy

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 2126-2136

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b08894

关键词

cancer; Folin-Ciocalteu assay; polyoxometalate nanoclusters; non-inflammatory photothermal therapy; renal clearable

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31800834, 51902047]
  2. University Synergy Innovation Program of Anhui Province [GXXT-2019-045]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [YQ2019B001]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JZ2018HGPA0273, JZ2018HGTB0247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Similar to translated thermal ablative techniques in clinic, the occurrence of cellular necrosis during tumor photothermal therapy (PTT) would induce inflammatory responses that are detrimental to therapeutic outcomes. Inspired by the well-known colorimetric Folin-Ciocalteu assay, monodispersed and renal-clearable tungsten (W)-based polyoxometalate nanoclusters (W-POM NCs, average diameter of around 2.0 nm) were successfully obtained here through a facile redox reaction with natural gallic acid in alkaline aqueous solution. Apart from excellent stability in the form of freeze-dried powder, the as-prepared W-POM NCs occupied considerable biocompatibility toward normal cells/tissues both in vitro and in vivo, since no obvious twdcities were observed by treating female Balb/c mice with concentrated WPOM NCs during the 30 day post-treatment period. More importantly, W-POM NCs exhibited not only considerable near-infrared (NIR) light absorption (coloration effect originated from the existence of electron-trapped W5+) for efficient PTT but also impressive anti-inflammatory ability (eliminating inflammation-related reactive oxygen species by the oxidation of W5+ into W6+ state) to achieve better therapeutic outcomes. Thus, our study pioneers the application of POMs for noninflammatory PTT with expected safety and efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据