4.8 Article

A Bioinspired Ultratough Multifunctional Mica-Based Nanopaper with 3D Aramid Nanofiber Framework as an Electrical Insulating Material

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 611-619

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b07192

关键词

bioinspired material; mica; aramid nanofiber; toughness; electrical insulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51973054]
  2. High-level Innovative Talent Project in Hunan Province [2018RS3055]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan province [2019JJ40069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid development of modern electrical equipment toward miniaturization and high power puts forward stringent requirements to the mechanical reliability, dielectric property, and heat resistance of electrical insulating materials. Simultaneous integration of all these properties for mica-based materials remains unresolved. Herein, inspired by the three-dimensional (3D) chitin nanofiber framework within the layered architecture of natural nacre, we report a large-area layered mica-based nanopaper containing a 3D aramid nanofiber framework, which is prepared by a sol-gel-film transformation process. The coupling of 3D aramid nanofiber framework and oriented mica nanoplatelets imparts the nanopaper with good mechanical strength, particularly outstanding ductility (close to 80%) and toughness (up to 109 MJ m(-3)), which are 4-240 and 6-220 times higher than those of all other nacre-mimetics. Meanwhile, the excellent mechanical properties are integrated with high dielectric strength (164 kV min(-1)), excellent heat resistance (T-g = 268 degrees C), good solvent resistance, and nonflammability, much better than conventional mica-based materials. Additionally, we successfully demonstrate its continuous production in the form of nanotape. The fabulous multiproperty combination and continuous production capability render the mica-based nanopaper a very promising electrical insulating material in miniaturized high-power electrical equipment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据