4.8 Article

Impact of SnF2 Addition on the Chemical and Electronic Surface Structure of CsSnBr3

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 12353-12361

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b22967

关键词

perovskites; CsSnBr3; impact of SnF2; chemical composition; photoemission; thin-film solar cells

资金

  1. SolarERAnet program HESTPV via the Israel Ministry of Energy
  2. Yotam project
  3. Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association
  4. Impuls-und Vernetzungsfonds of the Helmholtz-Association [VH-NG-423]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the chemical and electronic structure of cesium tin bromide (CsSiiBr(3)) and how it is impacted by the addition of 20 mol % tin fluoride (SnF2) to the precursor solution, using both surface-sensitive lab-based soft X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and near-surface bulk-sensitive synchrotron-based hard XPS (HAXPES). To determine the reproducibility and reliability of conclusions, several (nominally identically prepared) sample sets were investigated. The effects of deposition reproducibility, handling, and transport are found to cause significant changes in the measured properties of the films. Variations in the HAXPES-derived compositions between individual sample sets were observed, but in general, they confirm that the addition of 20 mol % SnF2 improves coverage of the titanium dioxide substrate by CsSnBr3 and decreases the oxidation of Sn-II to Sn-IV while also suppressing formation of secondary Br and Cs species. Furthermore, the (surface) composition is found to be Cs-deficient and Sn-rich compared to the nominal stoichiometry. The valence band (VB) shows a SnF2-induced redistribution of Sn 5s-derived density of states, reflecting the changing Sn-II/Sn-IV ratio. Notwithstanding some variability in the data, we conclude that SnF2 addition decreases the energy difference between the VB maximum of CsSnBr3 and the Fermi level, which we explain by defect chemistry considerations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据