4.8 Article

Electroforming in Metal-Oxide Memristive Synapses

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 11806-11814

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b19362

关键词

electroforming; electronic synapse; memristor; metal oxide; conductive nanofilament

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [BRICS2018-2112DNEURO]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11661131002, 61874075]
  3. Ministry of Finance of China [SX21400213]
  4. CEITEC Nano Research Infrastructure (MEYS CR, 2016-2019) [LM2015041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Memristors have shown an extraordinary potential to emulate the plastic and dynamic electrical behaviors of biological synapses and have been already used to construct neuromorphic systems with in-memory computing and unsupervised learning capabilities; moreover, the small size and simple fabrication process of memristors make them ideal candidates for ultradense configurations. So far, the properties of memristive electronic synapses (i.e., potentiation/depression, relaxation, linearity) have been extensively analyzed by several groups. However, the dynamics of electroforming in memristive devices, which defines the position, size, shape, and chemical composition of the conductive nanofilaments across the device, has not been analyzed in depth. By applying ramped voltage stress (RVS), constant voltage stress (CVS), and pulsed voltage stress (PVS), we found that electroforming is highly affected by the biasing methods applied. We also found that the technique used to deposit the oxide, the chemical composition of the adjacent metal electrodes, and the polarity of the electrical stimuli applied have important effects on the dynamics of the electroforming process and in subsequent post-electroforming bipolar resistive switching. This work should be of interest to designers of memristive neuromorphic systems and could open the door for the implementation of new bioinspired functionalities into memristive neuromorphic systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据