4.8 Article

Indicator Displacement Assay Inside Dye-Functionalized Covalent Organic Frameworks for Ultrasensitive Monitoring of Sialic Acid, an Ovarian Cancer Biomarker

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 12990-12997

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c00101

关键词

covalent organic framework; indicator displacement assay; ovarian cancer biomarker; functionalized hybrid material; on-off-on sensing mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571142, 21971194]
  2. Developing Science Funds of Tongji University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying biomolecules for disease diagnosis requires simple, accurate, and reliable analytical techniques. Multiple signal transduction pathways have promoted the development of various biological analysis systems. However, most systems are largely limited by a single mechanism or model analysis, which can easily lead to false-positive/negative results. Herein, we report a covalent organic framework (COF) (TpPa-1) functionalized with a dye (fluorescein sodium) and design this hybrid material (TpPa-1@Dye) to fabricate hydrogels for subsequent analysis with the indicator displacement assay (IDA) method. Selecting a suitable metal cation (Cr3+) for the preparation of hydrogels can reduce the background fluorescence, improve the detection sensitivity, and increase the corresponding sensing selectivity. The TpPa-1@Dye functions as an indicator in the IDA-in-COF system, and Cr3+ is a receptor of the analyte (sialic acid (SA), a biomarker for ovarian cancer diagnosis). Based on the above studies, the integrative logic operations (AND + IMP) are further established, it helps in elucidating the design rules of the IDA-in-COF approach. This work represents the first effort in designing IDA-in-COF luminescent sensors with an On-Off-On mechanism to determine biomarkers and provides a new approach for developing hybrid COF luminescent materials as analysis platforms for human health monitoring.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据