4.8 Article

Variable-Energy Hard X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy: A Nondestructive Tool to Analyze the Cathode-Solid-State Electrolyte Interface

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 2293-2298

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b16343

关键词

solid-state battery; interface; ALD; X-ray photoemission spectroscopy; HRTEM

资金

  1. China Automotive Battery Research Institute, Beijing
  2. Nature Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Canada Research Chair Program (CRC)
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  5. Canadian Light Sources (CLS)
  6. University of Western Ontario
  7. CLS Postdoctoral Student Travel Support Program
  8. MITACS Elevate postdoctoral program
  9. State Key Lab of Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

All-solid-state batteries are expected to be promising next-generation energy storage systems with increased energy density compared to the state-of-the-art Li-ion batteries. Nonetheless, the electrochemical performances of the all-solid-state batteries are currently limited by the high interfacial resistance between active electrode materials and solid-state electrolytes. In particular, elemental interdiffusion and the formation of interlayers with low ionic conductivity are known to restrict the battery performance. Herein, we apply a nondestructive variable-energy hard X-ray photoemission spectroscopy to detect the elemental chemical states at the interface between the cathode and the solid-state electrolyte, in comparison to the widely used angle-resolved (variable-angle) X-ray photoemission spectroscopy/X-ray absorption spectroscopy methods. The accuracy of variable-energy hard X-ray photoemission spectroscopy is also verified with a focused ion beam and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. We also show the significant suppression of interdiffusion by building an artificial layer via atomic layer deposition at this interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据