4.8 Article

Ultrasensitive Fiber-Based ZnO Nanowire Network Ultraviolet Photodetector Enabled by the Synergism between Interface and Surface Gating Effects

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 1054-1060

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b18185

关键词

UV photodetectors; synergetic gating effects; ZnO; flexible electronics; on/off ratio

资金

  1. Joint Fund of Equipment Pre-research and Ministry of Education [6141A02022518]
  2. National Program for Support of Topnotch Young Professionals
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2018-ot04]
  4. NSFC [81702095]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M663854]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A flexible UV photodetector with a high on/off ratio is extremely important for environmental sensing, optical communication, and flexible optoelectronic devices. In this work, a flexible fiber-based UV photodetector with an ultrahigh on/off ratio is developed by utilizing the synergism between interface and surface gating effects on a ZnO nanowire network structure. The synergism between two gating effects is realized by the interplay between surface band bending and the Fermi level through the nanowire network structure, which is proved through the control experiments between the ZnO micro/nanowire photodetector and micro/nanowire junction photodetector, and the corresponding Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) measurements. The on/off ratio of the fiber-based ZnO nanowire network UV photodetector reaches 1.98 x 10(8) when illuminated by 1.0 mW cm(-2) UV light, which is 20 times larger than the largest reported result under the same UV illumination. This new UV sensor also has a high resolution to UV light intensity change in the nW cm(-2) range. Furthermore, when the fiber-based photodetector is curved, it still shows excellent performance as above. This work gives a new effective route for the development of a high-performance UV photodetector or other optoelectronic detection devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据