4.8 Review

Multimodal Characterization of Materials and Decontamination Processes for Chemical Warfare Protection

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 12, 期 13, 页码 14721-14738

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b19494

关键词

chemical warfare agents; simulants; metal-organic frameworks; polyoxometalates; X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy; X-ray diffraction; in situ characterization

资金

  1. U.S. Army Research Laboratory
  2. U.S. Army Research Office [W911NF-15-2-0107]
  3. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [CB3587]
  4. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program [LDRD 18-047]
  5. DOE Office of Science [DE-SC0012704]
  6. DOE [DE-AC0206CH11357, DE-AC02-76SF00515]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This Review summarizes the recent progress made in the field of chemical threat reduction by utilizing new in situ analytical techniques and combinations thereof to study multifunctional materials designed for capture and decomposition of nerve gases and their simulants. The emphasis is on the use of in situ experiments that simulate realistic operating conditions (solid-gas interface, ambient pressures and temperatures, time-resolved measurements) and advanced synchrotron methods, such as in situ X-ray absorption and scattering methods, a combination thereof with other complementary measurements (e.g., XPS, Raman, DRIFTS, NMR), and theoretical modeling. The examples presented in this Review range from studies of the adsorption and decomposition of nerve agents and their simulants on Zr-based metal organic frameworks to Nb and Zr-based polyoxometalates and metal hydro)oxide materials. The approaches employed in these studies ultimately demonstrate how advanced synchrotron-based in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy and diffraction can be exploited to develop an atomic- level understanding of interfacial binding and reaction of chemical warfare agents, which impacts the development of novel filtration media and other protective materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据