4.3 Article

Excessive Absenteeism Due to Asthma in California Elementary Schoolchildren

期刊

ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS
卷 20, 期 7, 页码 950-957

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2019.12.003

关键词

asthma; population health; school absenteeism

资金

  1. Health Resources and Services Administration [T32HP30037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies of asthma-related school absenteeism have reported absenteeism dichotomously (ie, any school days missed vs none). However, schools use higher thresholds to identify and intervene for students at risk of chronic absenteeism (18 days or >= 10% schoolyear missed), which is associated with negative health and educational outcomes. We sought to identify factors associated with excessive absenteeism (EA) due to asthma (>= 9 days missed), a threshold based on a convention defined by Attendance Works for absenteeism risk, and is linked to decreased academic performance and increased risk of chronic absenteeism. METHODS: We examined responses for asthma-related absenteeism from the 2011 to 2014 California Health Interview Survey for children ages 5-11. Multivariate logistic regression modeled odds ratios of EA for demographic, healthcare utilization, and asthma-related factors. Sensitivity analysis was performed modeling a >= 1 threshold (any absenteeism). RESULTS: 715 respondents represent an estimated 314,200 California schoolchildren with asthma. 50.3% of students missed >= 1 day, and 11.7% missed >= 9 days of school due to asthma. Odds of EA were significantly higher for younger children, lower-income families, and rural students, but not significant for any absenteeism. Indicators of greater asthma severity and poorer control were significantly associated with both EA and any absenteeism. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified factors significantly associated with EA that were not significant for lower absence thresholds. This may help direct school-based asthma interventions for which limited resources must target students at higher risk of chronic absenteeism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据