4.4 Article

Variation in ligand responses of the bitter taste receptors TAS2R1 and TAS2R4 among New World monkeys

期刊

BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-016-0783-0

关键词

Bitter taste receptor; TAS2R; G protein-coupled receptor; New World monkey; Interspecific functional variation; Molecular evolution

资金

  1. Leading Graduate Program in Primatology and Wildlife Sciences, Kyoto University, KAKENHI grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [25891012, 12 J04270, 22247036, 15H02421, 24370096, 24405018, 26117512, 15H05242]
  2. Yamada Science Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26117512, 22247036, 24405018, 15H05242, 16K18630, 25891012, 16H01338, 15H02421, 16H04919] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: New World monkeys (NWMs) are unique in that they exhibit remarkable interspecific variation in color vision and feeding behavior, making them an excellent model for studying sensory ecology. However, it is largely unknown whether non-visual senses co-vary with feeding ecology, especially gustation, which is expected to be indispensable in food selection. Bitter taste, which is mediated by bitter taste receptors (TAS2Rs) in the tongue, helps organisms avoid ingesting potentially toxic substances in food. In this study, we compared the ligand sensitivities of the TAS2Rs of five species of NWMs by heterologous expression in HEK293T cells and calcium imaging. Results: We found that TAS2R1 and TAS2R4 orthologs differ in sensitivity among the NWM species for colchicine and camphor, respectively. We then reconstructed the ancestral receptors of NWM TAS2R1 and TAS2R4, measured the evolutionary shift in ligand sensitivity, and identified the amino acid replacement at residue 62 as responsible for the high sensitivity of marmoset TAS2R4 to colchicine. Conclusions: Our results provide a basis for understanding the differences in feeding ecology among NWMs with respect to bitter taste.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据