4.6 Article

Short-term load forecasting of urban gas using a hybrid model based on improved fruit fly optimization algorithm and support vector machine

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 666-677

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.06.003

关键词

Short-term; Gas load; Forecasting; Urban gas; Fruit fly optimization algorithm; Support vector machine

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201708030006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accurate forecasting of short-term load for urban gas is the premise of gas supply sales, pipe network planning, and energy optimization scheduling. This paper adopts a hybrid model that integrates the fruit fly optimization algorithm (FFOA), simulated annealing algorithm (SA), cross factor (CF) and support vector machine (SVM) to forecast the short-term gas load of urban gas. In the model, SA and CF are used to optimize the FFOA algorithm. This paper takes the urban gas system in Kunming, China as a case study and uses the CF-SA-FFOA-SVM algorithm to predict the gas consumption and compares the results with the other four forecasting methods such as back-propagation neural network (BPNN) and autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA). Besides, this paper analyzes the influence of temperature types (daily maximum temperature and daily mean temperature) in models on forecasting results, and the applicability of the algorithm for forecasting weekly and monthly gas load is analyzed. Moreover, the impact of grouping raw data by the feature on forecasting result is discussed. The following conclusions are drawn: (1) compared with other forecasting models, CF-SA-FFOA-SVM model has higher gas load forecasting accuracy. (2) for Kunming city, if the daily maximum temperature is used as the input variable in the gas load forecasting model, the forecasting accuracy is higher. (3) grouping raw data according to holiday attributes or gas types can effectively improve the accuracy of load forecasting. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据