4.4 Article

Effect of motivational interviewing on gestational weight gain and fetal growth in pregnant women with type 2 diabetes

期刊

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000733

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novo Nordisk Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To study how lifestyle coaching with motivational interviewing to improve adherence to healthy eating affects gestational weight gain and fetal growth in pregnant women with type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting. Research design and methods A cohort study including a prospective intervention cohort of consecutive, singleton pregnant, Danish-speaking women with type 2 diabetes included between August 2015 and February 2018 and a historical reference cohort included between February 2013 and August 2015. The intervention consisted of a motivational interviewing to improve adherence to healthy eating in addition to routine care. The reference cohort received routine care only. The main outcomes were gestational weight gain and large for gestational age (LGA) infants. Results Ninety-seven women were included in the intervention cohort and 92 in the reference cohort. Pre-pregnancy body mass index (32.8 +/- 6.9 kg/m(2) vs 32.4 +/- 7.4 kg/m(2), p=0.70), gestational weight gain (9.2 +/- 5.8 kg vs 10.2 +/- 5.8 kg, p=0.25), HbA1c in early pregnancy (6.7%+/- 1.1% vs 6.5%+/- 1.3% (50 +/- 12 mmol/mol vs 48 +/- 14 mmol/mol), p=0.32) and late pregnancy (5.9%+/- 0.5% vs 6.0%+/- 0.6% (41 +/- 6 mmol/mol vs 42 +/- 7 mmol/mol), p=0.34) were comparable in the two cohorts. LGA infants occurred in 20% vs 31%, p=0.07, respectively, and after adjustment for maternal characteristics 14% vs 27% delivered LGA infants (p=0.04). Birth weight z-score was 0.24 +/- 1.36 vs 0.61 +/- 1.38, p=0.06. Conclusions Motivational interviewing to improve adherence to healthy eating in addition to routine care in pregnant women with type 2 diabetes tended to reduce fetal overgrowth without major effect on gestational weight gain. Further studies investigating the cost-benefit of enhancing motivation are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据