4.2 Article

Palliative care training in undergraduate medical, nursing and allied health: a survey

期刊

BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE
卷 12, 期 E4, 页码 E489-E492

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002025

关键词

palliative care; education; death

资金

  1. Marie Curie Care [MCCC-FPO-16-U]
  2. UCLH NIHR Biomedical Research Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Training in end-of-life care (EOLC) varies across courses and professions, indicating a lack of consistency. Further research is needed to address identified barriers and improve the current training.
Objectives Impending death is poorly recognised. Many undergraduate healthcare professionals will not have experience of meeting or caring for someone who is dying. As death can occur in any setting, at any time, it is vital that all healthcare students, regardless of the setting they go on to work in, have end-of-life care (EOLC) training. The aim was to determine current palliative care training at the undergraduate level, in multiple professions, in recognising and communicating dying. Methods Current UK undergraduate courses in medicine, adult nursing, occupational therapy, social work and physiotherapy were included. All courses received an email asking what training is currently offered in the recognition and communication of dying, and what time was dedicated to this. Results A total of 73/198 (37%) courses responded to the request for information. 18/20 medical courses provided training in recognising when patients were dying (median 2 hours), and 17/20 provided training in the communication of dying (median 3 hours). 80% (43/54) of nursing and allied health professional courses provided some training in EOLC. Many of the course organisers expressed frustration at the lack of resources, funding and time to include more training. Those courses with more palliative care provision often had a 'champion' to advocate for it. Conclusions Training in EOLC was inconsistent across courses and professions. Further research is needed to understand how to remove the barriers identified and to improve the consistency of current training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据