4.4 Article

Rationale-based selection of optimal operating strategies and gene dosage impact on recombinant protein production in Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris)

期刊

MICROBIAL BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 315-327

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13498

关键词

-

资金

  1. MINECO
  2. FEDER [CTQ2016-74959-R]
  3. National Council of Science, Technology and Technological Innovation (CONCYTEC)
  4. National Fund for Scientific, Technological and Technological Innovation Development (FONDECYT)
  5. PIF scholarship from the Universitat Autnoma de Barcelona

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Its features as a microbial and eukaryotic organism have turned Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris) into an emerging cell factory for recombinant protein production (RPP). As a key step of the bioprocess development, this work aimed to demonstrate the importance of tailor designing the cultivation strategy according to the production kinetics of the cell factory. For this purpose, K. phaffii clones constitutively expressing (P-GAP) Candida rugosa lipase 1 (Crl1) with different gene dosage were used as models in continuous and fed-batch cultures. Production parameters were much greater with a multicopy clone (MCC) than with the single-copy clone (SCC). Regarding production kinetics, the specific product generation rate (q(P)) increased linearly with increasing specific growth rate (mu) in SCC; by contrast, q(P) exhibited saturation in MCC. A transcriptional analysis in chemostat cultures suggested the presence of eventual post-transcriptional bottlenecks in MCC. After the strain characterization, in order to fulfil overall development of the bioprocess, the performance of both clones was also evaluated in fed-batch mode. Strikingly, different optimal strategies were determined for both models due to the different production kinetic patterns observed as a trade-off for product titre, yields and productivity. The combined effect of gene dosage and adequate mu enables rational process development with a view to optimize K. phaffii RPP bioprocesses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据