4.7 Article

Natural rubber/reduced-graphene oxide composite materials: Morphological and oil adsorption properties for treatment of oil spills

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 -, 页码 79-89

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2019.05.007

关键词

Oil sorbent; Natural rubber; Reduced graphene oxide; Composite material; Adsorption isotherm; Reusability

资金

  1. International Postgraduate Program in Hazardous Substance and Environmental Management, Chulalongkorn University
  2. Green Materials for Industrial Application Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A green sorbent material was fabricated through the simple addition of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) to natural rubber (NR) latex. The effect of rGO content in the NR foam on petroleum oil adsorption was investigated. The addition of rGO in NR increased the petroleum oil adsorption capacity of the resulting NR/rGO (NRG) composite foam (12-21 g g(-1) ) with respect to those of the pure NR foam (8-15 g g(-1)) and a commercial sorbent (6-7 g g(-1)). The adsorption capacity was optimal for 0.5 phr rGO (NRG-0.5). Further, the environmenta l conditions (temperature and waves) affected the oil adsorption capacity of the sorbent materials. The adsorption kinetics of the sorbent materials for crude AXL oil was best described with pseudo-second-order kinetics. The interparticle diffusion model revealed three steps whereas the adsorption isotherms approximated the Langmuir isotherms. Moreover, the oil adsorption mechanisms of the NR and NRG sorbent materials were compared to that of a commercial sorbent. The high elasticity of the NRG-0.5 composite foam improved not only the oil adsorption capacity but also the reusability of the sorbent material. The presence of rGO increased the strength of the NRG-0.5 compared to that of pure NR, which resulted in a high-performance and reusable material with an oil removal efficiency higher than 70% after 30 uses. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cairo University.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据