4.6 Article

Regulation of RXR-RAR Heterodimers by RXR- and RAR-Specific Ligands and Their Combinations

期刊

CELLS
卷 8, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells8111392

关键词

RAR; RXR; ligands; retinoids; heterodimers; coactivators; corepressors; transcription

资金

  1. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-13-BSV6-000301]
  2. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer [ARCA08/4/1056]
  3. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universite de Montpellier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The three subtypes (alpha, beta, and gamma) of the retinoic acid receptor (RAR) are ligand-dependent transcription factors that mediate retinoic acid signaling by forming heterodimers with the retinoid X receptor (RXR). Heterodimers are functional units that bind ligands (retinoids), transcriptional co-regulators and DNA, to regulate gene networks controlling cell growth, differentiation, and death. Using biochemical, crystallographic, and cellular approaches, we have set out to explore the spectrum of possibilities to regulate RXR-RAR heterodimer-dependent transcription through various pharmacological classes of RAR- and RXR- specific ligands, alone or in combination. We reveal the molecular details by which these compounds direct specificity and functionality of RXR-RAR heterodimers. Among these ligands, we have reevaluated and improved the molecular and structural definition of compounds CD2665, Ro41-5253, LE135, or LG100754, highlighting novel functional features of these molecules. Our analysis reveals a model of RXR-RAR heterodimer action in which each subunit retains its intrinsic properties in terms of ligand and co-regulator binding. However, their interplay upon the combined action of RAR- and RXR-ligands allows for the fine tuning of heterodimer activity. It also stresses the importance of accurate ligand characterization to use synthetic selective retinoids appropriately and avoid data misinterpretations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据