4.7 Article

Analysis on the influences of atomization characteristics on heat transfer characteristics of spray cooling

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101799

关键词

Spray cooling; Spray atomization; PIV; Flow pattern distribution; Heat transfer coefficient; Nano-alumina additive

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806096]
  2. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [SJCX 0336]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education institutions of China [18KJB560007]
  4. Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Aircraft Environment Control and Life Support, MIIT, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics [KLAECLS-E-201902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of big data leads to the increasing heat dissipation of data center chips. As an efficient pattern to remove high heat flux, spray cooling has huge potential for data center cooling. Spray cooling system was established combined with PIV (Particle Image Velocimetry) system. The PIV was used to measure the flow pattern distribution of different nozzle sprays, while the surface heat flux and heat transfer coefficient were obtained by the thermocouples. The results show that as the spray diameter decreases, the outlet pressure and outlet velocity of the droplet increase, and the spray cone angle increases, causing only a small amount of droplets actually participate in the heat exchange, resulting in a higher velocity and a smaller heat transfer coefficient. It is also inferred that better uniformity of droplets velocity is beneficial for the heat transfer performance. Moreover, to further enhance the heat transfer performance, nano-alumina solution with five different fractions was applied to the experimental system. It is found that the heat transfer coefficient of the surface reaches an optimum value with a maximum velocity obtained by the PIV when the mass fraction of the solution is 0.08%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据