4.7 Article

Is smart city resilient? Evidence from China

期刊

SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY
卷 50, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101636

关键词

Urban resilience; Smart city; AHP-TOPSIS method; Infrastructure; Regression analysis

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFD1100202]
  2. MOE Project of Humanities and Social Sciences [17YJAZH038]
  3. Social Science Project of Jiangsu Province [18GLB002]
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_0203]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242017520044]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smart city is originally aimed at dealing with various urban problems due to rapid urbanization, like energy shortage, congestion, and environmental pollution. The Chinese government has been devoting to the promotion of smart cities for many years. However, it is unconfirmed whether the city is more resilient with all the modern technologies provided when unexpected predicaments like climate changes or disasters occur. Therefore, it is urgent to consider resilience in the smart city. This paper provides a MCDM approach to assess and rank the resilience of 187 smart cities in China. The results demonstrate that the overall resilience of smart cities is at a relatively low level. There is also a significant unbalance of resilience between smart cities due to different infrastructural, economic, social, institutional, and environmental conditions. The potential links between urban smartness and resilience were also explored, and the results showed significant positive relationship between the smartness of a city and its resilience. Evidence also proved that developing smartness is more or less useful for improving urban resilience. Suggestions such as strengthening the development of infrastructure and economy, and enhancing the multi-stakeholders' cooperation are proposed to further promote the smart and resilient development in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据