4.6 Article

Predicting maths anxiety from mathematical achievement across the transition from primary to secondary education

期刊

ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191459

关键词

maths; anxiety; education

资金

  1. UK Medical Research Council [MR/M021475/1]
  2. US National Institutes of Health [AG046938]
  3. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) grant [602768]
  4. ERC [295366]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [295366] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The primary- to secondary-education transition is a substantive life event for many children. The transition can be associated with changes in the developmental trajectories of both emotional health and academic achievement. The current study looked at whether the trajectory of mathematical attainment and emotional health (anxiety) across this transition predicted later maths anxiety. A secondary analysis of data from the Twin Early Development Study (TEDS) was performed. The statistical models were fit on the 753 participants (one from each twin pair) for which there were measures of mathematical performance across the primary- to secondary-education transition and maths anxiety at age 18. Two multi-level growth models were fit predicting mathematical attainment and anxiety over the primary- to secondary-education transition. The intercepts and slopes for each child were extracted from these models and used as predictors of subsequent maths anxiety at age 18. These effects were adjusted for biological sex, socio-economic status, verbal cognitive ability and general anxiety. Maths anxiety at age 18 was significantly predicted by both pre-transition levels of anxiety and mathematical attainment and their rate of change across the primary- to secondary-education transition. However, the effects were small, suggesting that theories of maths anxiety may have overplayed the role of prior mathematical attainment and general anxiety.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据