4.5 Article

A Multi-Element Expression Score Is A Prognostic Factor In Glioblastoma Multiforme

期刊

CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 -, 页码 8977-8989

出版社

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S228174

关键词

glioblastoma; gene expression score; prognosis; TAAs; TME

类别

资金

  1. Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2013Y113]
  2. Zhuhai Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [ZH01110405160015PWC]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB553706]
  4. Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Program [201707010244]
  5. Guangdong Medical Scientific Research Foundation [A2017483]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly malignant tumor of the central nervous system. Although primary GBM patients receive extensive therapies, tumors may recur within months, and there is no objective and scientific method to predict prognosis. Adoptive immunotherapy holds great promise for GBM treatment. However, the expression profiles of the tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and tumor immune microenvironment (TME) genes used in immunotherapy of GBM patients have not been fully described. The present study aimed to develop a predictive tool to evaluate patient survival based on full analysis of the expression levels of TAAs and TME genes. Methods: Expression profiles of a panel of 87 TAAs and 8 TME genes significantly correlated with poor prognosis were evaluated in 44 GBM patients and 10 normal brain tissues using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). A linear formula (the LASSO algorithm based in the R package) weighted by regression coefficients was used to develop a multi-element expression score to predict prognosis; this formula was cross-validated by the leave-one-out method in different GBM cohorts. Results: After analysis of gene expression, clinical features, and overall survival (OS), a total of 8 TAAs (CHI3L1, EZH2, TRIOBP, PCNA, PIK3R1, PRKDC, SART3 and EPCAM), 1 TME gene (FOXP3) and 4 clinical features (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR), number of basophils (BAS), age and treatment with standard radiotherapy and chemotherapy) were included in the formula. There were significant differences between high and low scoring groups identified using the formula in different GBM cohorts (TCGA (n=732) and GEO databases (n=84)), implying poor and good prognosis, respectively. Conclusion: The multi-element expression score was significantly associated with OS of GBM patients. The improve understanding of TAAs and TMEs and well-defined formula could be implemented in immunotherapy for GBM to provide better care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据